Union Pacific workers file class action Americans With Disabilities Act complaint against railroad

(Source: Nichols Kaster, PLLP press release, February 29, 2016)

SEATTLE, Wash. — On February 19, 2016, six current and former employees of Union Pacific Railroad Company filed a class action lawsuit in the Western District of Washington at Seattle (Case No. CV15-1865JCC), asserting that Union Pacific engaged in a pattern and practice of discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C 12101 et seq.

The case alleges that Union Pacific has put numerous long-time employees out of work due to their actual or perceived disabilities even though they could perform their jobs. The suit explains that Union Pacific requires certain employees to disclose particular health events or conditions. Once an employee makes such a disclosure, Union Pacific removes the employee from service and conducts a so-called “Fitness-for-Duty” procedure, but the employees allege that this evaluation does not assess whether an employee can perform the essential functions of their job. The employee is not even physically evaluated, and Union Pacific routinely disregards the opinions of treating doctors who do evaluate the employee. Instead, Union Pacific collects extensive medical information from the employee and conducts a “file review” of the information. Plaintiffs allege that Union Pacific then mines the medical information and disqualifies the employees from service–either by deeming them “medically disqualified” or by issuing permanent, unnecessary work restrictions that it then refuses to accommodate.

The six named plaintiffs allege that Union Pacific discriminated against them through this “Fitness-for-Duty” protocol. The plaintiffs include the following employees, all of whom were taken out of service by Union Pacific:

– An individual who has had a pacemaker for more than 20 years as a Union Pacific employee, who had never had a work-related incident as a result;

– An individual with fully-controlled epilepsy who had never had a work-related incident as a result;

– An individual who had lightheadedness on a few isolated incidents outside of work;

– An individual with a fully-controlled heart condition who never had a work-related incident;

– An individual with fully-controlled seizure disorder; and

– An Iraq War veteran formerly diagnosed with PTSD who never had a work incident as a result.

Plaintiffs seek to certify a class of: “Individuals who were removed from service over their objection, and/or suffered another adverse employment action, during their employment with Union Pacific for reasons related to a Fitness-for-Duty evaluation at any time from 300 days before the earliest date that a named Plaintiff filed an administrative charge of discrimination to the resolution of this action.”

Tuesday, March 01, 2016